Information

What does it mean for a type of plant to “vegatatively dominate” as opposed to “taxonomically dominate”?

What does it mean for a type of plant to “vegatatively dominate” as opposed to “taxonomically dominate”?


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

I'm reading Plants and the K-T Boundary, by Douglas Nichols and Kirk Johnson. On page forty-seven the authors write the following: "By the Campanian many floras were vegetatively co-dominated by angiosperms, conifers, and ferns, but taxonomically dominated by angiosperms."

My first intuition was that this means angiosperms, conifers, and ferns were equally dominating the available resources in many ecosystems, but that at the same time the angiosperms had become more evolutionary diverse. But I'm very new to reading about paleobotany, and biology in general, so I thought I'd better check that. Thanks for your time.

What is the difference between vegetative and taxonomic domination in the above example?



Comments:

  1. Winwood

    is very curious :)

  2. Felkis

    I cannot speak much on this subject.

  3. Jawad

    please periphrase



Write a message